POLIS Index Australia for Party Leaders
Highlights by 2SLGBTQ+ Identification
Ethical perceptions of Australian party leaders differ based on 2SLGBTQ+ identification, but Anthony Albanese is consistently viewed as more ethically credible than Peter Dutton across all groups. Among respondents who identify as 2SLGBTQ+, Albanese receives a POLIS score of 3.16, while Dutton scores just 1.60. This significant 1.56-point gap indicates that 2SLGBTQ+ Australians perceive Albanese as more aligned with values such as fairness, transparency, and accountability.
Among non-2SLGBTQ+ Australians, Albanese scores 3.18, while Dutton receives 2.14. Although the gap narrows to 1.04 points, the trend remains consistent: Albanese is perceived as more ethically trustworthy. The slightly higher scores for both leaders in this group suggest a more moderate evaluation, but the preference for Albanese persists.
The data reveals that 2SLGBTQ+ Australians have a more pronounced ethical preference for Albanese compared to their non-2SLGBTQ+ counterparts. This could be attributed to Albanese's perceived commitment to inclusive policies and advocacy for marginalized communities, resonating strongly with the 2SLGBTQ+ population.
Dutton's lower scores among 2SLGBTQ+ respondents may reflect concerns about his stance on issues affecting this community. The consistent gap across both groups underscores the importance of perceived ethical alignment in shaping public trust and support.
Overall, the POLIS Index demonstrates that Anthony Albanese holds a substantial ethical credibility advantage over Peter Dutton among both 2SLGBTQ+ and non-2SLGBTQ+ Australians. The findings highlight the significance of inclusive leadership and ethical alignment in earning the trust of diverse communities.
What values do people in democratic nations want their political parties to imbue and represent?
Integrity
Integrity means acting consistently with one’s principles and telling the truth, even when it's inconvenient. In a democracy, people expect their political representatives to follow through on promises and live up to the values they claim to hold. Without integrity, public trust quickly erodes.
Benevolence
Benevolence reflects care, compassion, and a commitment to serving the public rather than personal or partisan interests. Citizens expect those in power to act in the best interest of society, especially for vulnerable or underserved groups. When benevolence is lacking, politics can feel distant and self-serving.
Accountability
Accountability means being answerable for decisions and willing to admit mistakes. Democratic systems rely on the idea that leaders serve the people and must face consequences if they fall short. When accountability is strong, citizens feel empowered to demand better.
Legitimacy
Legitimacy is the belief that those in power deserve their authority and represent the people fairly. It’s not just about winning elections — it’s about earning public trust through ethical, democratic leadership. Without legitimacy, political systems struggle to function effectively or peacefully.
Competence
Competence is the ability to get things done — to design effective policies, manage resources, and solve problems. In democratic societies, voters want leaders who can deliver real results and meet the needs of diverse communities. Good intentions matter, but capable execution is essential.
Transparency
Transparency is about openness — making decisions visible, explaining them clearly, and sharing information honestly. In a democracy, people have a right to know how decisions are made and why. Transparency builds public confidence and helps prevent corruption or manipulation.
Procedural Fairness
Procedural fairness ensures that rules are applied equally, decisions are made impartially, and everyone is treated with respect. In a diverse democracy, fairness is the foundation of legitimacy — it reassures people that the system is not biased or rigged. Fair processes create faith in just outcomes.